| Lisbon Treaty: Second Verse, Same as the First | | Print | |
| Written by James Heiser |
| Friday, 09 October 2009 01:51 |
|
The debate over whether the Lisbon Treaty is substantively different to the Constitution is effectively over. Virtually every EU Government has admitted that the Lisbon Treaty maintains the substance of the Constitution. The “new” treaty reintroduces virtually all the changes proposed in the original Constitutional Treaty, by transferring them into the two existing treaties, the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty Establishing the European Community (TEC). The latter will be renamed the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (hereafter referred to as TFEU). Confidential negotiations on how to implement the Lisbon Treaty have produced proposals to allow the EU to negotiate treaties and even open embassies across the world. “Confidential” is the polite way of saying “secret”—it allows one to describe a process which is essentially being hidden from the people until it is a “done deal” without all the messiness of public protests and other efforts to derail the plan before it becomes public. If managed with sufficient secrecy, the entire plan is ready for implementation before it bursts forth into the public eye, ready to subdue all opposition, like Athena from the brow of Zeus. Any protests which do arise may be met with mock-alarm and the retort, “But we have been working hard toward this goal for years. Why are you only protesting now?” Indeed, it is ironic that just when those countries such as the Soviet Union, which have tried to run everything from the centre, are learning that success depends on dispersing power and decisions away from the centre, there are some in the Community who seem to want to move in the opposite direction. But it must be in a way which preserves the different traditions, parliamentary powers and sense of national pride in one's own country; for these have been the source of Europe's vitality through the centuries. Thatcher’s conclusion to this speech struck, with great foresight, at the very heart of the problem of what is now coming to pass with the Lisbon Treaty: “And what we need now is to take decisions on the next steps forward, rather than let ourselves be distracted by Utopian goals. Utopia never comes, because we know we should not like it if it did.”
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Trackback(0)
Comments (2)
![]()
Never returned to Europe after WWII
My late father stayed in our great nation after he came home from Bremerhaven Germany. He was right as an American to do this. He went to work against the socialists and commununists in our country and was very successful. He did befriend three German girls who were orphaned by FDR's and Hitler's war saying so much for enmity and was right about two Germans - Pastor Deitrich Bonhoffer and Clau von Stauffenbrg. Had Stauffenberg succeeded and lived WWII would have ended in 1944 and not 1945. I did spend two weeks in Sweden in 1973 on vaction to see a friend of the family Karin Wahlstrom. She told me the truth about a socialist friend of hers with a son in Communist Cuba and I quit writing to her feeling betrayed and deceived. My Souther Baptists are sending bibles globally to spread the word on Christ our Lord and Savior. Dad was an expert on Communism and the non-Communist left meaning that he was a good friend of Goldwater. God is aq tough taskmaster ever since George Washington prayed for freedom and victory. |
Copyright 2010. The John Birch Society | PO Box 8040, Appleton, Wisconsin 54912 | 920-749-3780 | Standing for Family and Freedom | Terms