|
A sting operation was used by the city of New York to try and catch violations of federal gun laws at multi-state gun shows. Even for an anti-gun advocate like New York’s Mayor Bloomberg, hiring a firm to go undercover in states other than his own under the guise of stopping the flow of guns into his city raises eyebrows, and some serious questions.
Over 40 investigators from Kroll Associates were hired to go undercover, posing as gun buyers hoping to slide under the radar of the background checks via a straw purchase or various other scenarios, and visited seven gun shows in Nevada, Ohio, and Tennessee during the summer. (A straw purchase is the term for when an accomplice of the real gun purchaser signs the papers and receives the background check — and then the goods, but with the actual purchaser not present and not participating.) The undercover detectives attempted to buy guns over and over in the hopes of catching gun dealers in illegal gun sales.
Out of 47 purchases, 35 have been termed by New York as illegal in some way. The Associated Press reports that the city is not planning any civil action.
Showing the resulting videos at a news conference at New York’s City Hall Bloomberg said, “What you saw was a willful disregard of the law, and you saw it again and again, and again.” A copy of the printed report is being sent to every congressman, while the findings are being shared with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives in the hopes that more gun laws can be enacted.
This excursion into other states cost the city over $1 million, something the citizens themselves should be up in arms about. Bloomberg has zero power over gun sales outside of New York. Certainly there is plenty of real crime in New York City that he could attend to, if he were serious about stopping crime.
So there are questions as to why he did it, aside from his hatred for guns and his lack of support for the Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights, and the fact that he is running for reelection and needs anti-gun organizations’ endorsements.
The case could be made that Bloomberg and his anti-gun squad engaged in some questionable tactics in their efforts to produce an anti-gun video. For instance: Was any of it staged just to make actual gun dealers look bad? If not, did they have the legal permission from local law enforcement in each state and county in which the gun shows were held to engage in entrapment? After their lies were put forth, their phony purchases were completed, and they were in possession of “illegal guns,” would they subsequently be considered guilty of breaking federal gun laws?
Trackback(0)
|